Guide Disclaimer
Dec 28, 2010 18:58:01 GMT -5
Post by triggs (SABR) on Dec 28, 2010 18:58:01 GMT -5
Opinions expressed in these guides are on a as-experienced basis. This means the information could be a fluke or actual consistent issues. TAL is not responsible for conflicting information
If you have an argument against one of the statements in any of the guides you are free to post, and we will gladly discuss the guide, it's contents, and the reasoning behind the ratings.
All that we ask is:
1. The the argument have some level of factual basing (personal or website) (i.e. This website proves this, or I have seen it personally).
2. The argument is well written (i.e. no DUD3 U R WR0NG).
3. Keep a level head. As noted, I do not know anything, nor claim to know everything, I am open to the fact a company has changed, or that I was wrong to begin with. All I ask is you conduct yourself accordingly.
4. The websites you link to for argument are peer-reviewed and factual. This does not include any retailer websites, the only reason for this is retail websites have a low quality of users posting reviews (i.e. DUD3 TH1S GUN 1S 1337) and does not conduct itself as a well based argument (much like Wikipedia in college essays). Airsoft community websites such as ASF/ASR/So Cal/MIA are well respected and well known websites, and generally have the level of information needed to base an argument. However, I strongly encourage any arguments based from these websites are reviewed by yourself for conflicting arguments (as they may end up simply proving my point).
If you have an argument against one of the statements in any of the guides you are free to post, and we will gladly discuss the guide, it's contents, and the reasoning behind the ratings.
All that we ask is:
1. The the argument have some level of factual basing (personal or website) (i.e. This website proves this, or I have seen it personally).
2. The argument is well written (i.e. no DUD3 U R WR0NG).
3. Keep a level head. As noted, I do not know anything, nor claim to know everything, I am open to the fact a company has changed, or that I was wrong to begin with. All I ask is you conduct yourself accordingly.
4. The websites you link to for argument are peer-reviewed and factual. This does not include any retailer websites, the only reason for this is retail websites have a low quality of users posting reviews (i.e. DUD3 TH1S GUN 1S 1337) and does not conduct itself as a well based argument (much like Wikipedia in college essays). Airsoft community websites such as ASF/ASR/So Cal/MIA are well respected and well known websites, and generally have the level of information needed to base an argument. However, I strongly encourage any arguments based from these websites are reviewed by yourself for conflicting arguments (as they may end up simply proving my point).